Current Public Consultations: Difference between revisions

From committees
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>


==[https://www.cnv.org/city-hall/finances/financial-plan City of North Van draft 2025 budget consultation]==
==[https://www.dnv.org/streets-transportation/mountain-highway-safety-improvements Central Mountain Hwy Safety improvements (Arborlynn to Lynn Valley Road)]==
* aaa
* Safety improvements including bikelanes, sidewalks and improved crossings.
**now open until Jan 17th, 2025
**Open House - Thursday, Oct-12th, 6-8pm, Karen Magnussen Community Recreation Centre, Eagle Room
* [https://dnv.civilspace.io/en/projects/mountain-highway-safety-improvements/engagements/mountain-highway-safety-improvements-part-two/sections/1 Link to the Survey] now open until Oct 24th, 2023 (~5 mins, 6 webpages with mostly multiple choice)
________________
________________
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''':
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''':
**On the 5th page, ccc
**On the 5th page, '''Ross Rd to E 27th Street''' regarding the - Bikelane southbound + MUP northbound
***The Bikelanes should be protected where possible. Plastic posts in the buffer on segments without Driveways, and the Upper Lynn Valley Rd design where there are driveways.
***Prefer to see a sidewalk plus a separate protected bike lane on the East side. Busy Multi-User Paths not comfortable for either people walking or on bikes - especially with the continued growth of ebikes.
***The Bike lanes need to be extended all the way past Ross Rd to join the existing bike lanes on Lynn Valley Road, Otherwise there will be a one block "Gap" that is not comfortable for most people on Bikes.
**'''Whiteley Crt to E18th'''
***Option 1 provides more comfort for both people walking and on bikes. Ensure the bikes lanes are wide enough to allow passing.
***On block or segments with no driveways the Bikelanes on the west side should be protected with plastic posts in the buffer. (North & south of 24th, power line crossing, ...)
***On segments with driveways the west side bikelanes should use the Upper Lynn Valley design.
**'''East 18th Street to Arborlynn Drive'''
*** We think both should be implemented - and at the very least - 14th to 18th requires protected bike lanes. In our comments we noted that this was a 'false choice' and requested both. A direct, but busy route for the confident people on bikes - especially on the downhill. The quieter route is important for the less confident people on bikes (“Interested but concerned”)
*** We recommend selecting Option 1 in the choices, since that is all that is allowed by the choices. Some additional comments:
***Option 1 - Mtn Hwy - slightly less steep, but next to heavy traffic
****Ensure the bikelanes are protected from traffic, and with concrete barriers at the sharp corners
****The bikelanes should be wide enough to permit passing, especially uphill.
***Option 2 - Neignbourhood bikeway on E18th, Appin, Arbourlynn - bit steeper, much quieter.
****Protected bikelanes on both sides of Arbourlynn with separated sidewalk. Busy Multi-User Paths are not comfortable for people walking or on bikes. Bi-directional bike paths on one side of bi-directional streets are a well known hazard.
****Consider a connection along Appin, up 20th, along Viewlynn to E27th. This would provide an alternative, quiet neighbourhood bikeway all the way to Lynn Valley Town Centre.

Latest revision as of 20:28, 3 January 2025

Public input is critical when Council and Staff make trade-offs and decisions.
Please make sure your voice is heard!!

The Section titles below are linked to the surveys.

City of North Van draft 2025 budget consultation

  • aaa
    • now open until Jan 17th, 2025

________________

  • Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey:
    • On the 5th page, ccc