Current Public Consultations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<br/><br/> |
<br/><br/> |
||
==[https://www.cnv.org/city-hall/finances/financial-plan City of North Van draft 2025 budget consultation]== |
|||
==[https://www.dnv.org/streets-transportation/mountain-highway-safety-improvements Central Mountain Hwy Safety improvements (Arborlynn to Lynn Valley Road)]== |
|||
* aaa |
|||
* Safety improvements including bikelanes, sidewalks and improved crossings. |
|||
**now open until Jan 17th, 2025 |
|||
**Open House - Thursday, Oct-12th, 6-8pm, Karen Magnussen Community Recreation Centre, Eagle Room |
|||
* [https://dnv.civilspace.io/en/projects/mountain-highway-safety-improvements/engagements/mountain-highway-safety-improvements-part-two/sections/1 Link to the Survey] now open until Oct 24th, 2023 (~5 mins, 6 webpages with mostly multiple choice) |
|||
________________ |
________________ |
||
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''': |
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''': |
||
**On the 5th page, ccc |
|||
**On the 5th page, labelled <b>"Ross Rd to E 27th Street"</b> regarding the - Bikelane southbound + MUP northbound |
|||
*** (See image at right).[[File:RossRd-27th.png|thumb]] |
|||
***Our suggested comment is: "Add protection (buffer+ posts) between traffic lanes and bike/multi-user paths on both sides, Narrow the traffic lanes to slow traffic speeds and provide buffer. |
|||
***Consider including: On the East side, I'd prefer to see a sidewalk with a separate bike lane. MUPs are shown to cause conflicts with people walking and cycling - not nice for people on foot - especially with the continued growth of ebikes (a good thing!) but average speeds are much higher - especially a long a utility trip route like this. |
|||
***The end of the bike lane before Ross road - dumping people on bikes into a right turn lane for cars must be fixed on this section. |
|||
**Whiteley Crt to E18th - |
|||
***Option 1 provides more comfort for both people walking and on bikes. Ensure the bikes lanes are wide enough to allow passing. |
|||
**Loading zone/short term Parking pockets - expensive |
|||
**East 18th Street to Arborlynn Drive - |
|||
***Option 1 - Mtn Hwy - slightly less steep, but next to heavy traffic |
|||
****Ensure the bikelanes are protected from traffic, especially at the sharp corners |
|||
****The bikelanes should be wide enough to permit passing, especially uphill. |
|||
***Option 2 - E18th, Appin, Arbourlynn - bit steeper, quieter, could connect to E20-viewlynn |
|||
****Protected bikelanes on both sides of Arbourlynn with separated sidewalk. |
|||
***Consider connection to 20th and viewlynn (quieter parallel route to Mtn Hwy) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 3 January 2025
Public input is critical when Council and Staff make trade-offs and decisions.
Please make sure your voice is heard!!
The Section titles below are linked to the surveys.
City of North Van draft 2025 budget consultation
- aaa
- now open until Jan 17th, 2025
________________
- Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey:
- On the 5th page, ccc