Current Public Consultations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(37 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<br/><br/> |
<br/><br/> |
||
==[https://www.dnv.org/streets-transportation/mountain-highway-safety-improvements Central Mountain Hwy Safety improvements (Arborlynn to Lynn Valley Road)]== |
|||
==[https://dnv.civilspace.io/en/projects/lynn-valley-road-active-transportation-phase-2/engagements/150 '''Upper Lynn Valley Road - Peters to Dempsey''']== |
|||
* |
* Safety improvements including bikelanes, sidewalks and improved crossings. |
||
**Open House - Thursday, |
**Open House - Thursday, Oct-12th, 6-8pm, Karen Magnussen Community Recreation Centre, Eagle Room |
||
* [https://dnv.civilspace.io/en/projects/ |
* [https://dnv.civilspace.io/en/projects/mountain-highway-safety-improvements/engagements/mountain-highway-safety-improvements-part-two/sections/1 Link to the Survey] now open until Oct 24th, 2023 (~5 mins, 6 webpages with mostly multiple choice) |
||
________________ |
________________ |
||
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''': |
*'''Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey''': |
||
**On the 5th page, '''Ross Rd to E 27th Street''' regarding the - Bikelane southbound + MUP northbound |
|||
***The Bikelanes should be protected where possible. Plastic posts in the buffer on segments without Driveways, and the Upper Lynn Valley Rd design where there are driveways. |
|||
*'''Priorities:''' |
|||
***Prefer to see a sidewalk plus a separate protected bike lane on the East side. Busy Multi-User Paths not comfortable for either people walking or on bikes - especially with the continued growth of ebikes. |
|||
*** 1. Safety for people should be a higher priority than parking. |
|||
*** |
***The Bike lanes need to be extended all the way past Ross Rd to join the existing bike lanes on Lynn Valley Road, Otherwise there will be a one block "Gap" that is not comfortable for most people on Bikes. |
||
**'''Whiteley Crt to E18th''' |
|||
***3. While the concept of balance is important. The past 100 years of car-focused development and people walking and people riding bikes shunted to small sections of public-right-of-way demonstrates there is a lot of space to be returned to people walking, people on bikes, and transit - than is currently occupied by car & truck use. So true balance, will not hesitate to take space from car & truck use, as we are currently so out-of-balance. |
|||
***Option 1 provides more comfort for both people walking and on bikes. Ensure the bikes lanes are wide enough to allow passing. |
|||
***On block or segments with no driveways the Bikelanes on the west side should be protected with plastic posts in the buffer. (North & south of 24th, power line crossing, ...) |
|||
*'''Option Selection:''' |
|||
***On segments with driveways the west side bikelanes should use the Upper Lynn Valley design. |
|||
**Our priority selection order is: '''Options 1, then 2, and then 3.''' |
|||
**'''East 18th Street to Arborlynn Drive''' |
|||
*** We think both should be implemented - and at the very least - 14th to 18th requires protected bike lanes. In our comments we noted that this was a 'false choice' and requested both. A direct, but busy route for the confident people on bikes - especially on the downhill. The quieter route is important for the less confident people on bikes (“Interested but concerned”) |
|||
***We find option 2 and 3 acceptable, but less desirable. Option 2 requires a safe crossings - perhaps a light at Kilmer. Option 3 on Hoskins is quite steep - so downhill speeds on Hoskins will make cars/trucks exiting driveways with limited visibility (big hedges at or over the property-line) a potentially deadly hazard. For both road options there are a large # of driveways and thus the mobility lanes will be hard to protect. |
|||
*** We recommend selecting Option 1 in the choices, since that is all that is allowed by the choices. Some additional comments: |
|||
***Option 1 - Mtn Hwy - slightly less steep, but next to heavy traffic |
|||
***For this reason for Option 1, 2, and 3: Signage on the downhill leg should read every 200 metres: "People on bikes may take the full lane" |
|||
****Ensure the bikelanes are protected from traffic, and with concrete barriers at the sharp corners |
|||
<br/> |
|||
****The bikelanes should be wide enough to permit passing, especially uphill. |
|||
***Option 2 - Neignbourhood bikeway on E18th, Appin, Arbourlynn - bit steeper, much quieter. |
|||
****Protected bikelanes on both sides of Arbourlynn with separated sidewalk. Busy Multi-User Paths are not comfortable for people walking or on bikes. Bi-directional bike paths on one side of bi-directional streets are a well known hazard. |
|||
****Consider a connection along Appin, up 20th, along Viewlynn to E27th. This would provide an alternative, quiet neighbourhood bikeway all the way to Lynn Valley Town Centre. |
Latest revision as of 02:23, 11 October 2023
Public input is critical when Council and Staff make trade-offs and decisions.
Please make sure your voice is heard!!
The Section titles below are linked to the surveys.
Central Mountain Hwy Safety improvements (Arborlynn to Lynn Valley Road)
- Safety improvements including bikelanes, sidewalks and improved crossings.
- Open House - Thursday, Oct-12th, 6-8pm, Karen Magnussen Community Recreation Centre, Eagle Room
- Link to the Survey now open until Oct 24th, 2023 (~5 mins, 6 webpages with mostly multiple choice)
________________
- Some things you may want to consider when completing the survey:
- On the 5th page, Ross Rd to E 27th Street regarding the - Bikelane southbound + MUP northbound
- The Bikelanes should be protected where possible. Plastic posts in the buffer on segments without Driveways, and the Upper Lynn Valley Rd design where there are driveways.
- Prefer to see a sidewalk plus a separate protected bike lane on the East side. Busy Multi-User Paths not comfortable for either people walking or on bikes - especially with the continued growth of ebikes.
- The Bike lanes need to be extended all the way past Ross Rd to join the existing bike lanes on Lynn Valley Road, Otherwise there will be a one block "Gap" that is not comfortable for most people on Bikes.
- Whiteley Crt to E18th
- Option 1 provides more comfort for both people walking and on bikes. Ensure the bikes lanes are wide enough to allow passing.
- On block or segments with no driveways the Bikelanes on the west side should be protected with plastic posts in the buffer. (North & south of 24th, power line crossing, ...)
- On segments with driveways the west side bikelanes should use the Upper Lynn Valley design.
- East 18th Street to Arborlynn Drive
- We think both should be implemented - and at the very least - 14th to 18th requires protected bike lanes. In our comments we noted that this was a 'false choice' and requested both. A direct, but busy route for the confident people on bikes - especially on the downhill. The quieter route is important for the less confident people on bikes (“Interested but concerned”)
- We recommend selecting Option 1 in the choices, since that is all that is allowed by the choices. Some additional comments:
- Option 1 - Mtn Hwy - slightly less steep, but next to heavy traffic
- Ensure the bikelanes are protected from traffic, and with concrete barriers at the sharp corners
- The bikelanes should be wide enough to permit passing, especially uphill.
- Option 2 - Neignbourhood bikeway on E18th, Appin, Arbourlynn - bit steeper, much quieter.
- Protected bikelanes on both sides of Arbourlynn with separated sidewalk. Busy Multi-User Paths are not comfortable for people walking or on bikes. Bi-directional bike paths on one side of bi-directional streets are a well known hazard.
- Consider a connection along Appin, up 20th, along Viewlynn to E27th. This would provide an alternative, quiet neighbourhood bikeway all the way to Lynn Valley Town Centre.
- On the 5th page, Ross Rd to E 27th Street regarding the - Bikelane southbound + MUP northbound