TriCities Committee Priorities For 2020: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= HUB Tri-Cities Local Committee 2020 Action Plan = |
|||
The following Action Plan consists of three committee priorities, listed in no particular order of importance. Each priority includes a “Summary” section that describes what it is and why it’s important. Each priority also has a “Measuring completion” section that describes what we consider completion of that priority for the year, and appoints a point person. |
The following Action Plan consists of three committee priorities, listed in no particular order of importance. Each priority includes a “Summary” section that describes what it is and why it’s important. Each priority also has a “Measuring completion” section that describes what we consider completion of that priority for the year, and appoints a point person. |
||
Priority 1. Improve our relationships with municipalities. |
== Priority 1. Improve our relationships with municipalities.== |
||
Summary |
=== Summary === |
||
HUB’s local committees have the potential to build positive and meaningful relationships with local governments. It’s much easier for us to make this happen locally than it would be for someone from Vancouver who would have to cover the entire GVA at once. Let’s make sure we are making use of this potential. 2019 was a great year for our relationship with Port Moody staff. Let’s keep this going while focusing on similar improvements with Port Coquitlam and Coquitlam. |
HUB’s local committees have the potential to build positive and meaningful relationships with local governments. It’s much easier for us to make this happen locally than it would be for someone from Vancouver who would have to cover the entire GVA at once. Let’s make sure we are making use of this potential. 2019 was a great year for our relationship with Port Moody staff. Let’s keep this going while focusing on similar improvements with Port Coquitlam and Coquitlam. |
||
Measuring completion |
=== Measuring completion === |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
|Poco |
|||
|Done |
|||
|- |
|||
|Coquitlam |
|||
|Done: Richard Stewart came to a meeting |
|||
|- |
|||
|PoMo |
|||
|TBD/ optional |
|||
|} |
|||
Improve relationships with PoCo and Coquitlam government and staff. |
|||
⚫ | |||
PoCo lead: TBD |
PoCo lead: TBD |
||
Coquitlam lead: Scott Shirley |
Coquitlam lead: Scott Shirley |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
PoMo co-leads: Andrew and Scott |
PoMo co-leads: Andrew and Scott |
||
Let’s also try and get some contact with BeAn staff. |
Let’s also try and get some contact with BeAn staff. |
||
BeAn lead: Colleen |
BeAn lead: Colleen |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Done |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Done| |
|||
- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Done, by Andrew and Scott in PoMo Transportation Committee |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Done (todo link to letter) |
|||
|- |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Done (todo link to letter) |
|||
|} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
As a committee, we have lots of energy and ideas. Seeing that translate into actual visible change keeps us all going. Let’s try to structure our group and our activity so that our efforts have maximum results. |
As a committee, we have lots of energy and ideas. Seeing that translate into actual visible change keeps us all going. Let’s try to structure our group and our activity so that our efforts have maximum results. |
||
Measuring completion |
=== Measuring completion === |
||
Improve meeting structure to bolster our collective “long-term memory”. We are pretty good at getting through a meeting agenda in a focused way but tend not to be as good at keeping track of longer-term work items. |
Improve meeting structure to bolster our collective “long-term memory”. We are pretty good at getting through a meeting agenda in a focused way but tend not to be as good at keeping track of longer-term work items. |
||
Read mission statement at the beginning and end of every meeting. |
Read mission statement at the beginning and end of every meeting. |
||
Review top five gaps at the beginning of every meeting. |
Review top five gaps at the beginning of every meeting. |
||
Review Action Plan priorities at the beginning of every meeting. |
Review Action Plan priorities at the beginning of every meeting. |
||
All meeting agendas should have links to our Gap List and Action Plan |
All meeting agendas should have links to our Gap List and Action Plan |
||
Improve onboarding of new members |
Improve onboarding of new members |
||
Have a wiki page to email new members |
Have a wiki page to email new members |
||
Links to Gap List, Action Plan |
Links to Gap List, Action Plan |
||
Write a short article on bike advocacy in the Tri-Cities HUB wiki page, covering the following questions and whatever else seems appropriate. |
Write a short article on bike advocacy in the Tri-Cities HUB wiki page, covering the following questions and whatever else seems appropriate. |
||
What is HUB? What is a local committee? |
What is HUB? What is a local committee? |
||
Who’s involved in making decisions about bike infrastructure around here? |
Who’s involved in making decisions about bike infrastructure around here? |
||
Line 48: | Line 87: | ||
Point person: Andrew Hartline |
Point person: Andrew Hartline |
||
Priority 3. Improve visibility of our committee in the community. |
== Priority 3. Improve visibility of our committee in the community. == |
||
Summary |
=== Summary === |
||
Our effectiveness as advocates is multiplied if we can reach people in the community who resonate with our message. Let’s try and improve our visibility within the wider community, including both enthusiasts (commuters, racers, tourers, randonneurs), and the far bigger population of “not particularly bikey, but interested” people out there. |
Our effectiveness as advocates is multiplied if we can reach people in the community who resonate with our message. Let’s try and improve our visibility within the wider community, including both enthusiasts (commuters, racers, tourers, randonneurs), and the far bigger population of “not particularly bikey, but interested” people out there. |
||
Measuring completion |
=== Measuring completion === |
||
Let’s advertise our meetings in the Tri-City News. |
Let’s advertise our meetings in the Tri-City News. |
||
Let’s try to get ourselves and our perspectives as cycling advocates into the Tri-City News. |
Let’s try to get ourselves and our perspectives as cycling advocates into the Tri-City News. |
||
Let’s maintain a presence at community events such as the Port Moody Community Fair, Coquitlam’s Festival du Bois, and the Port Coquitlam Rivers and Trails Festival. |
Let’s maintain a presence at community events such as the Port Moody Community Fair, Coquitlam’s Festival du Bois, and the Port Coquitlam Rivers and Trails Festival. |
||
Booth SubCommittee should look at whether we can update our booth swag and activities. Is there something we can add to increase the engagement and impact of our booths at community fairs? |
Booth SubCommittee should look at whether we can update our booth swag and activities. Is there something we can add to increase the engagement and impact of our booths at community fairs? |
||
Let’s reach out to local cycling organizations and see whether representatives are interested in coming to a meeting. |
Let’s reach out to local cycling organizations and see whether representatives are interested in coming to a meeting. Tri-Cities Cycling, BVC, Escape Velocity, BC Randonneurs? |
||
Tri-Cities Cycling |
|||
BVC |
|||
Escape Velocity |
|||
BC Randonneurs |
|||
Let’s use connections with these organizations to drum up citizen support for city cycling initiatives. People who don’t want cycling infrastructure in their backyard are good at getting others to contact City representatives, and we should be good at it too. |
Let’s use connections with these organizations to drum up citizen support for city cycling initiatives. People who don’t want cycling infrastructure in their backyard are good at getting others to contact City representatives, and we should be good at it too. |
||
Point person/ people: TBD |
Point person/ people: TBD |
Latest revision as of 16:59, 27 February 2021
The following Action Plan consists of three committee priorities, listed in no particular order of importance. Each priority includes a “Summary” section that describes what it is and why it’s important. Each priority also has a “Measuring completion” section that describes what we consider completion of that priority for the year, and appoints a point person.
Priority 1. Improve our relationships with municipalities.
Summary
HUB’s local committees have the potential to build positive and meaningful relationships with local governments. It’s much easier for us to make this happen locally than it would be for someone from Vancouver who would have to cover the entire GVA at once. Let’s make sure we are making use of this potential. 2019 was a great year for our relationship with Port Moody staff. Let’s keep this going while focusing on similar improvements with Port Coquitlam and Coquitlam.
Measuring completion
Goal: Invite representatives of PoCo and Coq staff to a meeting in 2020. Maintain relationship with Port Moody government and staff. Option/ stretch goal: Let's see them at a meeting too. Continue to provide input in Port Moody Transportation Committee meetings.
Poco | Done |
Coquitlam | Done: Richard Stewart came to a meeting |
PoMo | TBD/ optional |
PoCo lead: TBD
Coquitlam lead: Scott Shirley
PoMo co-leads: Andrew and Scott
Let’s also try and get some contact with BeAn staff.
BeAn lead: Colleen
Goal: For each of our Top Five gaps, write 1 letter OR do 1 meeting OR get one article published.
Pitt River Bridge to Coquitlam Center/ Lincoln Station, PoCo/ Coquitlam | Done | ||
Coquitlam Central Station to Port Mann Bridge, Coquitlam |
- |
Clarke Road, Port Moody | Done, by Andrew and Scott in PoMo Transportation Committee |
Guildford Way, Coquitlam | Done (todo link to letter) | ||
Braid Station to Port Mann Bridge | Done (todo link to letter) |
Priority 2. Improve committee focus.
Summary
As a committee, we have lots of energy and ideas. Seeing that translate into actual visible change keeps us all going. Let’s try to structure our group and our activity so that our efforts have maximum results.
Measuring completion
Improve meeting structure to bolster our collective “long-term memory”. We are pretty good at getting through a meeting agenda in a focused way but tend not to be as good at keeping track of longer-term work items.
Read mission statement at the beginning and end of every meeting.
Review top five gaps at the beginning of every meeting.
Review Action Plan priorities at the beginning of every meeting.
All meeting agendas should have links to our Gap List and Action Plan
Improve onboarding of new members
Have a wiki page to email new members
Links to Gap List, Action Plan
Write a short article on bike advocacy in the Tri-Cities HUB wiki page, covering the following questions and whatever else seems appropriate.
What is HUB? What is a local committee? Who’s involved in making decisions about bike infrastructure around here? 3 municipalities (list of key politicians and staff) MOTI Metro Vancouver (runs Colony Farm Parks) And don’t forget BeAn
Point person: Andrew Hartline
Priority 3. Improve visibility of our committee in the community.
Summary
Our effectiveness as advocates is multiplied if we can reach people in the community who resonate with our message. Let’s try and improve our visibility within the wider community, including both enthusiasts (commuters, racers, tourers, randonneurs), and the far bigger population of “not particularly bikey, but interested” people out there.
Measuring completion
Let’s advertise our meetings in the Tri-City News. Let’s try to get ourselves and our perspectives as cycling advocates into the Tri-City News. Let’s maintain a presence at community events such as the Port Moody Community Fair, Coquitlam’s Festival du Bois, and the Port Coquitlam Rivers and Trails Festival. Booth SubCommittee should look at whether we can update our booth swag and activities. Is there something we can add to increase the engagement and impact of our booths at community fairs? Let’s reach out to local cycling organizations and see whether representatives are interested in coming to a meeting. Tri-Cities Cycling, BVC, Escape Velocity, BC Randonneurs? Let’s use connections with these organizations to drum up citizen support for city cycling initiatives. People who don’t want cycling infrastructure in their backyard are good at getting others to contact City representatives, and we should be good at it too. Point person/ people: TBD