Difference between revisions of "HUB RAC letters to Municipalities and other local bodies"

From committees
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
== Return to RAC Home Page ==
 
== Return to RAC Home Page ==
 
*[http://wiki.bikehub.ca/committees/index.php?title=Regional_Advisory_Committee_Wiki Click Here]
 
*[http://wiki.bikehub.ca/committees/index.php?title=Regional_Advisory_Committee_Wiki Click Here]
  +
  +
== 2022 ==
  +
*[[Media:HUB RAC letter in support of United Blvd Corridor Study Mar 28 2022.pdf‎ | Letter to the City of Coquitlam in support of the United Blvd Corridor Study - Mar 28, 2022]]
  +
  +
== 2021 ==
  +
*[[Media:21_-_Metro_2050_Feedback_-_Final_(submitted_Nov._26,_21).pdf‎ | Recommendations to Metro Vancouver re: Metro 2050 update - Nov 26, 2021]]
  +
*[[Media:21_-_RAC_Letter_to_North_Vancouver_on_Safe_Passing_Distance_at_UBCM.pdf‎ | Letter to the City of North Vancouver Thanking them for Proposing Safe Passing Distance at UBCM - Sept 21, 2021]]
  +
  +
== 2020 ==
  +
*[[Media:HUB_Cycling_Feedback_for_Clean_Air_Climate_2050_plan.pdf_(submitted_July_23,_2020).pdf | Feedback on Clean Air/Climate 2050 Plan to Metro Vancouver - July 23, 2020]]
   
 
== 2019 ==
 
== 2019 ==
*[[Media:HUB Cycling submission to City of Coquitlam re the CVG connection to Port Mann.pdf | HUB Cycling Tri Cities Committee Letter to the City of Coquitlam re the CVG connection to the Port Mann - Oct 29 2019]]
+
[[Media:HUB Cycling submission to City of Coquitlam re the CVG connection to Port Mann.pdf | HUB Cycling Tri Cities Committee Letter to the City of Coquitlam re the CVG connection to the Port Mann - Oct 29 2019]]

Revision as of 16:40, 28 March 2022